Seattle Wiki
(replied)
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
I agree with Don here. The proper way to do this seems an external link to the article, not pasting it in this page.
 
I agree with Don here. The proper way to do this seems an external link to the article, not pasting it in this page.
 
: -- [[User:Matias|matias]] ([[User Talk:Matias|talk]]) 16:14, 24 Oct 2005 (PDT)
 
: -- [[User:Matias|matias]] ([[User Talk:Matias|talk]]) 16:14, 24 Oct 2005 (PDT)
  +
  +
While I agree that it's probably not the most appropriate way of doing this, I will say that putting the article on the Wiki allows it to be wikified, with links to various things within this wiki and externally. I wish some of the Media outlets in Seattle would do this, as it would give people an easy way to learn more about the background of any particular subject.
  +
  +
: -- [[User:Chadlupkes|Chad Lupkes]] 12/05/05

Latest revision as of 23:28, 5 December 2005

Another article by the woman who previously started a page titled Politics but then talked about herself. This one seems like it could be mildly useful or interesting, but all she's done is quote an article she (allegedly) wrote. It's more polemic than information.

Anyone else think this page is out of place on this wiki?

-- Don | Talk - Contributions 14:42, 24 Oct 2005 (PDT)

I agree with Don here. The proper way to do this seems an external link to the article, not pasting it in this page.

-- matias (talk) 16:14, 24 Oct 2005 (PDT)

While I agree that it's probably not the most appropriate way of doing this, I will say that putting the article on the Wiki allows it to be wikified, with links to various things within this wiki and externally. I wish some of the Media outlets in Seattle would do this, as it would give people an easy way to learn more about the background of any particular subject.

-- Chad Lupkes 12/05/05