Seattle Wiki
m (fixing dead links)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Cascadia Subduction Zone is a giant fault running off the coast of the [[Pacific Northwest]].
+
The Cascadia Subduction Zone is a signifcant fault running off the coast of the [[Pacific Northwest]], where the Juan de Fuca plate slides under the North American plate. When stress builds up between the plates, an earthquake occurs, which may also be accompanied by one or more tsunamis. This fault represents one of the biggest dangers towards Seattle. [[Cascadia Earthquake|The last time it went off]] was in 1700.
It is where the Juan de Fuca plate slides under the North American plate. When stress builds up between the plates an earthquake goes off sometimes accompanied by tsunamis. It's one of the biggest dangers towards Seattle. [[Cascadia Earthquake|The last time it went off]] was in 1700.
 
   
==Hazard to Seattle==
+
==Potential Hazard to Seattle==
The Cascadia Subduction Zone is in close enough range to Seattle to cause serious damage to the city. It would be "the big one" we all anticipate. A Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake would be around 9.0 magnitude. The shaking would be so strong that you would barely or not be able to stand in it for an eternity of about four minutes.
 
   
 
The Cascadia Subduction Zone is close enough to Seattle to cause serious damage to the city.<sup><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources" style="white-space: nowrap;">[''citation needed'']</span></sup> A Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake could be as severe as a 9.0 magnitude, resulting in shaking so strong that one would barely be able to stand during the earthquake.
Brick buildings would certainly collapse. So areas like Pioneer Square would be obliterated. Even with retrofits, brick constructions will still be severely damaged. Suburban housing with wooden frames could be less damaged if anchored to their foundations.
 
   
Seattle also has alot of area built on fill. In an earthquake, fill turns to liquid and structures on it can't be supported ,so they collapse as their foundations sink into the ground. Qwest Field, Safeco Field, Harbor Island, and the industrial district are all built on landfill. These areas will be the most damaged.
 
   
Experts debate what would happen to downtown's skyscrapers. In a normal quake they are some of the safest areas, but a Cascadia quake would be much stronger. Some argue they could not handle so much shaking and collapse. Others say some should remain standing. Even if they can stand, the debris from all of their damage like glass or other building material could bury the streets along with pedestrians and automobiles .
 
   
  +
Brick buildings would be likely to collapse, resulting in the potential oblitaration of areas like Pioneer Square.<sup><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources" style="white-space: nowrap;">[''citation needed'']</span></sup> Even with retrofits, brick constructions will still be severely damaged (because bricks move back and forth). Suburban homes with wooden frames might be less damaged if anchored to their foundations.<sup><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources" style="white-space: nowrap;">[''citation needed'']</span></sup>
Other structures at risk include highways and bridges. Notably the [[Alaskan Way Viaduct]] which is already at plan to be replaced due to earthquake risk.
 
   
 
Seattle also has a lot of area built on fill (which area?). In an earthquake, fill turns to liquid and structures on it can't be supported (how do we know this?) ,so structures collapse as their foundations sink into the ground. Qwest Field, Safeco Field, Harbor Island, the waterfront, and the industrial district are all built on landfill. These areas will be the most damaged. However, Safeco Field was built on pylons which were drilled into bedrock (not sitting on fill) and would be relatively unaffected by an earthquake.
Tsunamis would not pose a risk to Seattle because Puget Sound is protected by the Olympic Penninsula.
 
   
 
Experts debate what would happen to downtown's skyscrapers. In a normal quake they are some of the safest areas, but a Cascadia quake would be much stronger. Some argue the buildings could not handle so much shaking and would collapse, while others say some should remain standing.<sup><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources" style="white-space: nowrap;">[''citation needed'']</span></sup> Even if the buildings remain standing, the debris from building damage, such as glass or other building materials, could bury the streets along with pedestrians and automobiles.
It would still be the worst disaster Seattle has ever encountered.
 
   
 
Other structures at risk include highways and bridges, such as the [[Alaskan Way Viaduct]] which is already planned to be replaced due to earthquake risk.
The threat is not very well known. So if you are visiting or living in Seattle, be prepared and remember that you are in giant earthquake country.
 
  +
  +
Tsunamis from the fault itself would not pose a risk to Seattle because Puget Sound is protected by the Olympic Peninsula. But landslides in Puget Sound could cause tsunamis that could kill hundreds more and cause more damage. By the time the quake ended, thousands could be dead in Seattle alone. Tens of thousands more could die in other areas. Most likely, the city would never be the same.
  +
  +
The threat is not very well known<sup><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources" style="white-space: nowrap;">[''citation needed'']</span></sup>. So if you are visiting or living in Seattle, be prepared and remember that Seattle is potentially subject to severe earthquakes.
   
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
   
 
*[http://www.crew.org/ Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup]
 
*[http://www.crew.org/ Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup]
*[http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/megaquake_trans.shtml/ The Next Megaquake]
+
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20050525120958/http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/megaquake_trans.shtml/ The Next Megaquake]
 
 
[[category: Geology]]
 
[[category: Geology]]

Latest revision as of 07:13, 17 August 2014

The Cascadia Subduction Zone is a signifcant fault running off the coast of the Pacific Northwest, where the Juan de Fuca plate slides under the North American plate. When stress builds up between the plates, an earthquake occurs, which may also be accompanied by one or more tsunamis. This fault represents one of the biggest dangers towards Seattle. The last time it went off was in 1700.

Potential Hazard to Seattle[]

The Cascadia Subduction Zone is close enough to Seattle to cause serious damage to the city.[citation needed] A Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake could be as severe as a 9.0 magnitude, resulting in shaking so strong that one would barely be able to stand during the earthquake.


Brick buildings would be likely to collapse, resulting in the potential oblitaration of areas like Pioneer Square.[citation needed] Even with retrofits, brick constructions will still be severely damaged (because bricks move back and forth). Suburban homes with wooden frames might be less damaged if anchored to their foundations.[citation needed]

Seattle also has a lot of area built on fill (which area?). In an earthquake, fill turns to liquid and structures on it can't be supported (how do we know this?) ,so structures collapse as their foundations sink into the ground. Qwest Field, Safeco Field, Harbor Island, the waterfront, and the industrial district are all built on landfill. These areas will be the most damaged. However, Safeco Field was built on pylons which were drilled into bedrock (not sitting on fill) and would be relatively unaffected by an earthquake.

Experts debate what would happen to downtown's skyscrapers. In a normal quake they are some of the safest areas, but a Cascadia quake would be much stronger. Some argue the buildings could not handle so much shaking and would collapse, while others say some should remain standing.[citation needed] Even if the buildings remain standing, the debris from building damage, such as glass or other building materials, could bury the streets along with pedestrians and automobiles.

Other structures at risk include highways and bridges, such as the Alaskan Way Viaduct which is already planned to be replaced due to earthquake risk.

Tsunamis from the fault itself would not pose a risk to Seattle because Puget Sound is protected by the Olympic Peninsula. But landslides in Puget Sound could cause tsunamis that could kill hundreds more and cause more damage. By the time the quake ended, thousands could be dead in Seattle alone. Tens of thousands more could die in other areas. Most likely, the city would never be the same.

The threat is not very well known[citation needed]. So if you are visiting or living in Seattle, be prepared and remember that Seattle is potentially subject to severe earthquakes.

External Links[]